SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4070

PATNA HIGH COURT
Purnendu Singh, J
Rajesh Sah – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87044 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.Ajay Kumar Tiwary
For the Respondents: Mr.Md. Ataur Rahman

Court grants pre-arrest bail considering the lack of involvement of relatives in dowry-related allegations.

Headnote:The petitioners sought pre-arrest bail regarding an FIR alleging murder due to dowry demands. The court found that the petitioners, being relatives of the deceased, lacked involvement in the family affairs. Previous bail for similarly situated co-accused was noted. The court authorized bail contingent upon verification of antecedents and provided conditions under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Result: The petitioners are directed to be released on pre-arrest bail.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER

2 28-01-2026 Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwary, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Md. Ataur Rahman, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in connection with Basantpur P.S. Case No. 123 of 2025 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 80 of the BNS .

3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, the petitioners along with other accused persons have killed the daughter of the informant, due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that due to strained matrimonial relationship and some mental problem, the daughter of the informant (deceased) committed suicide as would appear from the postmortem report. Petitioners, who are close relatives of the husband of the deceased, have been roped in a false criminal case. Petitioners are Bhaisur of the deceased and they have no concern with the family affairs of her husband as they are living separately. Similarly situated co-accused has also been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 14.10.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No.66682 of 2025. Petitioners have clean antecedents. On these grounds, petitioners seek to be released on pre-arrest bail.

5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.

6. Having considered the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well, having perused the allegation made in the FIR and also the fact that the petitioners are Bhaisur of the deceased and they have no concern with the family affairs of her husband as they are living separately. I am of the opinion that petitioners, who have clean antecedents, have, prima facie, made out a case to be released on pre-arrest bail.

7. The petitioners, above named, are directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned District Court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, 1st Siwan / Concerned Court in connection with Basantpur P.S. Case No. 123 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

8. The learned District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and if it is found that the petitioners are involved in some other cases, as what has been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail application, this order will automatically lose its force.

(Purnendu Singh, J)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top