PATNA HIGH COURT
PURANDE SINGH, J
Shanti Devi – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
2 28-01-2026 Heard Mr. Bijay Prakash Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners; Mr. Brajendra Nath Pandey, learned APP for the State and Mr. Shiv Sagar Sharma, learned counsel for the informant.
2. The petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in connection with Nautan P.S. Case No. 149 of 2025 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 74, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the BNS .
3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, all the accused, including the petitioners, with common intention assaulted the informant and her entire family members, who sustained injury.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in the present case. Both the parties are agnates. The allegation is against the petitioners, who are female members of the family, that over a trivial matter of tree cutting, the accused persons forcibly entered the house of the informant, and the parties indulged in a fierce fight. The petitioners, in their self-defence, may have caused some injury on the person of the informant. The petitioners have clean antecedent. On these grounds,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.