SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4081

PATNA HIGH COURT
Purnendu Singh, J
Mahendra Kewat – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Aryan Singh
For the Respondents: Mr. Prem Kumar Jha, A.P.P.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER

2 28-01-2026 Heard Mr. Aryan Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Prem Kumar Jha, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No. 372 of 2025, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109, 74, 303(2), 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of the BNS .

3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, petitioners along with other co-accused persons, had assaulted the husband of the informant with an intention to kill.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case due to enmity. General and omnibus allegation has been levelled against the petitioners. Injuries sustained by the husband of the informant have been opined by the doctor to be simple in nature. On these grounds, petitioners seek to be released on pre-arrest bail.

5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.

6. Considering the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well as, the fact that general and om

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top