Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
PURNENDU SINGH, J
Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Tanti – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations relate to the abduction of a minor for marriage. (Para 4) |
| 2. opposition argued based on victim's statement; court found no incrimination against petitioners. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court grants bail under specific conditions if petitioners do not have prior offenses. (Para 7 , 8) |
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 28-01-2026 Heard Mr. Davendra Kumar Pandey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Ms. Ajit Kumar, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in connection with Nathnagar P.S. Case No. 152/2025 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 126(2),115(2),109, 96, 352 and 3(5) of the BNS .
3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, the co-
accused namely, Karan Tani, who is brother of the petitioners, had lured away the minor daughter of the informant, who was aged about 17 years, 2 months and 11 days, with an intention to perform marriage with her.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in the present case because they are brother and sister of the co-accused Karan Tanti, who is in
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
