PATNA HIGH COURT
Purnendu Singh, J
Soman Mukhiya @ Suman Mukhiya – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 28-01-2026 Heard Mr. Pawan Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in connection with Mahishi P.S. Case No. 194 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2), 74, 352, 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of the BNS .
3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, petitioners along with other co-accused persons were plucking mango from the mango orchard of the informant without permission and upon protest, they had assaulted the informant and his brother causing injury.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. Both the parties, who are agnate, were involved in dispute with respect to a piece of land, due to which, an altercation took place and both the sides entered into fierce fight and in the self-defence, petitioners may have caused some injury to the informant side, without intention. Injuries sustained by the informant side are found to be simple in nature as would ap
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.