SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4093

PATNA HIGH COURT
PURNENDU SINGH, J
Kusum Devi – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.Sushil Kumar Jha
For the Respondents: Ms.Nirmala Kumari, APP

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER

2 28-01-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Fatuha P.S.Case No.683 of 2024, registered for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 324(4), 85, 352 and 351 of BNS being PTN 9230/24, GR

1748/24.

3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, the marriage of the informant was solemnized with one Bipin Kumar in the Year, 2024 in accordance with Hindu rites and rituals but on the instigation of her Gotani, her husband assaulted her in drunken condition and throttled her to kill. Petitioner is own Gotani of the informant.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that petitioner is innocent and she has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner is own Gotani of the informant living in the same family, as such, quarrel between them is natural.

5. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the State submitted that a chance can be given to the parties for amicable settlement of the dispute outside the court.

6. At th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top