SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4102

PATNA HIGH COURT
Purnendu Singh, J
Suggi Devi


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Pankaj Kumar
For the Respondents: Mr. Narsingh Tanti, Mr. Naresh Dikshit, Ms. Shristi Singh

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER

2 28-01-2026 Heard Mr. Pankaj Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners; Mr. Narsingh Tanti, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State and Mr. Naresh Dikshit, learned SPP along with Ms. Shristi Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the O.P. No.2.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Giryak P.S. Case No. 75/2025 registered under Sections 126(2),115(2),281,125(a),125(b),132,109,324(4),303(2),317(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita ( BNS ), 2023.

3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, a raid was conducted by the Mining Inspector on the information received of illegal mining near Panchane river and five tractors were seized during the raid and the petitioners are family members of the owner of one of the seized trucks bearing Reg. No.

BR27E8098.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that offence is compoundable under Section 56(2) of the Bihar Minerals (Concession, Prevention of Illegal Mining Transportation and Storage) Amendment Rules and seeks to deposit the amount of compensation in accordance with the provision of the said Section.

5. Lear

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top