PATNA HIGH COURT
PURNENDU SINGH, J
Ranju Devi @ Rinju Devi, Sipahi Yadav – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 28-01-2026 Heard Mr. Manaur Alam, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Yogapatti P.S. Case No. 340 of 2025 registered under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 118(1), 303(2), 74, 109(1), 352 and
3(5) of the BNS.
3. The prosecution's story in brief is that petitioners along with other accused persons had assaulted the informant causing head injury and had also tried to outrage the modesty of the informant.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in the present case. Both the parties were involved in free fight with respect to a piece of land. However, learned counsel submitted that both the parties are next door neighbour and dispute, which primarily relates to allegation under Section 109 BNSS, can be resolved by way of amicable settlement outside the Court in light of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Naushey Ali & Ors. Vs.
State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. reported in (2025)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.