PATNA HIGH COURT
MR. PURNENDU SINGH, J
Niranjan Singh – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenges inaction against illegal encroachment. (Para 3) |
| 2. applicability of statutory remedies under land dispute laws. (Para 4) |
| 3. court disposes of the petition, allowing statutory remedies. (Para 5) |
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER
3 02-02-2026 Heard Mr. Rabindra Kumar Priyadarshi and Mr.
Mohan Kumar Tiwari, learned counsels appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Sajid Salim Khan, learned SC 25 for the State.
2. Petitioner has inter alia prayed for following reliefs in the paragraphs No.1 of the writ petition:-
“That the present writ petition is being filed against the arbitrary action of respondent authorities particularly respondent no.3 and 4 who on the connivance and guidance of private respondent adamant to demolish the residential house of the petitioner which is situated at Khata No.43 on Raiyti land of the petitioner.”
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner informs this Court that the petitioner is aggrieved by inaction of the Circle Officer, Fatuha, who has illegally allowed a piece of land, appertaining to Khata No.43, Plot No.69 to be encroached by some private persons illegally, however, the pet
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.