Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
PURNA SINGH, J
Md. Janul Haque @ Md. Jainul Haque – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court proceedings should be aimed at resolving disputes amicably where feasible. (Para 9) |
| 2. parties attempting mediation have to appear before the court as part of the agreement process. (Para 10 , 12) |
| 3. the court acknowledged prior cases showing the necessity of evaluating claims against factual circumstances. (Para 13) |
| 4. the nature of injuries in disputes must be considered for potential settlement. (Para 18) |
| 5. the severity and context of actions determine eligibility for bail and resolution terms. (Para 19 , 20) |
2 04-02-2026 At the outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners seeks to withdraw the prayer for bail on behalf of petitioner no.11 submitting that he has been arrested during the pendency of the present bail application. Accordingly, the prayer for bail on behalf of petitioner no.11 stands dismissed as withdrawn.
2. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner nos. 1 to 10, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State and learned counsel for the informant.
3. The petitioner nos. 1 to 10 apprehend their arrest in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 225 of 2025 registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2)(, 109(1), 303(2),
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
