SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4149

PATNA HIGH COURT
PURNNEDU SINGH, J
Vishnu Kumar Chaudhary – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mrs. Rupa Kumari
For the Respondents: Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh, A.P.P.

2 04-02-2026 Heard Mrs. Rupa Kumari, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Madanpur P.S. Case No. 318 of 2025, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 115(2), 126(2), 117(2), 109, 352, 351(3), 303(2) and 3(5) of the BNS . 3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, petitioner along with other accused persons had assaulted the informant side with an intention to kill. Specific allegation against the petitioner is that he had assaulted the Shambhu Kumar

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Specific allegation against the petitioner is that he had assaulted one Sudhir Kumar Chaudhary, who had sustained injury on his head, however, the same has been opined by the doctor to be simple in nature. Both the parties are Gotia. There is case and counter case between the parties. An scuffle took place between the parties due to trivial reason and in course of the same, the petitioner, in his self defence, may have caused some injury

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top