PATNA HIGH COURT
PURNNEDU SINGH, J
Vishnu Kumar Chaudhary – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
2 04-02-2026 Heard Mrs. Rupa Kumari, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Madanpur P.S. Case No. 318 of 2025, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 115(2), 126(2), 117(2), 109, 352, 351(3), 303(2) and 3(5) of the BNS . 3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, petitioner along with other accused persons had assaulted the informant side with an intention to kill. Specific allegation against the petitioner is that he had assaulted the Shambhu Kumar
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Specific allegation against the petitioner is that he had assaulted one Sudhir Kumar Chaudhary, who had sustained injury on his head, however, the same has been opined by the doctor to be simple in nature. Both the parties are Gotia. There is case and counter case between the parties. An scuffle took place between the parties due to trivial reason and in course of the same, the petitioner, in his self defence, may have caused some injury
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.