Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
HONOURABLE MR. PURNENDU SINGH, J
Bajo Yadav – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details regarding the petitioner's request and dispute over the land. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments from both the petitioner and the state regarding the land dispute. (Para 4) |
| 3. court's observations about appropriate legal processes. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. conclusion and directives issued. (Para 8) |
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 05-02-2026 Heard Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sinha, learned counsel ap-
pearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Arif Daula Siddique learned AC to SC-20 for the State.
2. The petitioner in paragraph no. 1 of the present writ petition has sought, inter alia, following relief(s), which is reproduced hereinafter:-
"(i) For quashing the impugned letter no. 783 dated 22-08-2024 issued by the circle officer, Laxmipur, Jamui to the officer in-charge by which it has been directed to maintain the law and order over the land situated at Mauza Kamlu, Thana no. 203/7, Khata No. 2, Khesara No. 366, Area- 48 decimal, Jamabandi No. 194 having its boundary:
North- Harhi Sah South- Rasta East- Gujjar Yadav (Vikas Kumar)
West- Denma Santhal Which is exclusive ancestral property of the petitioner as such the impugned letter is without jurisdiction and fit to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
