Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
Purnendu Singh, J
Shatrudhan Ram @ Shatrudhan Prasad – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Deptt. of Revenue and Land Reforms, Govt. of Bihar, Patna – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks legal recognition for land ownership. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. court affirms lawful land mutation based on decree. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. final decision directs circle officer to act in accordance with law. (Para 8 , 9) |
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER
5 05-02-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
2. The petitioner in paragraph no. 1 of the present writ petition has sought, inter alia, following relief(s), which is reproduced hereinafter:-
“ That this is an application for issue of an appropriate writ, order/Direction in the nature of Mandamus declaring the Parwana (copy not found) as null and void and issue direction to Resp. No.4 (Circle Officer, Bodhgaya, Gaya) to open demand of land admeasuring 64.24 decimals having Plot No.804 (old), 1011 (new) and Khata No. 211 (old), 357 (new) situated in village – Nawan Gosaichak under Bodhgaya revenue circle of Gaya district in the name of petitioner following the right, title and interest having been declared by the competent court / court of learned Munsif, 2nd, Gaya in favour of petitioner in Title Suit No. 105/2003 on 22.03.2005 and
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
