PATNA HIGH COURT
PURNEINDU SINGH, J
Chandrashekhar Rai – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court favors resolution outside of court. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 2. importance of mediation and potential settlement. (Para 10 , 14) |
6 11-02-2026 Heard Mr. Madhav Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Abhay Kumar, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Halai P.S. Case No. 78/2025 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 76, 303(2)
and 3(5) of the BNS .
3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, the accused persons named therein including the petitioner assaulted the informant and her family members, causing injuries.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner has clean antecedent. The informant is co-villager of the petitioner. It is further submitted by learned counsel that the petitioner has instructed him that to buy peace of mind, he wants to settle the dispute amicably outside the Court by way of mediation, in view of the fact that the incident took place due to land dispute. He informs that except Section 303 of BNS , all the Sections are
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.