Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
Rajesh Kumar Verma, J
Pankaj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments for bail (Para 4) |
| 3. court's decision on bail (Para 6) |
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kumar Alok, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER
2 15-01-2026 Heard Mr. Alok Kumar Alok, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since
27.08.2025 in connection with Minapur P.S. Case No. 106 of 2024, F.I.R. dated 18.03.2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 376 , 323, 354, 354B and 384 of the IPC.
3. According to prosecution case, this petitioner entered into the house of the informant who was sleeping with her son and committed rape upon her.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. The allegation as alleged in the complaint petition/F.I.R is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the complaint petition/F.I.R. From perusal
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
