Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
Rajesh Kumar Verma, J
Raushan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. bail application details and accusations outlined. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding the credibility of the allegations. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's decision on bail and conditions. (Para 6) |
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shivnandan Bharti, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mithlesh Kumar Khare, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER
2 15-01-2026 Heard Mr. Shivnandan Bharti, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Mithlesh Kumar Khare, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since
22.07.2025 in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 31 of 2024, F.I.R. dated 30.06.2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 376 , 354(C)/34 of the IPC and Section 66 (C) and
67(D) of the I.T. Act.
3. According to prosecution case, the informant was a married lady but living separately from her husband and this petitioner on the pretext of marriage established physical relation with the informant. It is further alleged that the petitioner's friend took her private photos and threatened her for making those pictures viral.
4. Learned counsel for the petit
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
