Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
RAJESH KUMAR VERMA, J
Ranjit Paswan @ Ranjeet Paswan – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. legal arguments presented regarding the bail and implications. (Para 4) |
| 2. court's decision to grant bail with conditions based on findings. (Para 6) |
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anshul, Sr. Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER
3 17-01-2026 Heard Mr. Anshul, learned senior counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Anil Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since
02.08.2025 in N.D.P.S Case No. 83 of 2025 arising out of Bhaptiyahi P.S. Case No. 170 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 02.08.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 21 (c), 22(c), 25 and
29 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985.
3. Recovery is of 19 liters of Codeine Syrup.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. It appears from the FIR that altogether 190 bottles of Codeine Phosphate & triprolidine Hydrochloride Syrup (WISCOF), each bottles contains 100 ml each was recovered from the place of occurrence and as pe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
