SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4454

PATNA HIGH COURT
Rajesh Kumar Verma, J
Abodh Ray @ Abodh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Sangeet Deokuliar
For the Respondents: Mr. Mohammed Arif

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

2 19-01-2026 Heard Mr. Sangeet Deokuliar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Mohammer Arif, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since

24.10.2025 in connection with Piprahi P.S. Case No. 190 of 2024, F.I.R. dated 12.12.2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 126, 115(2), 352, 109, 303(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S. , 2023.

3. According to prosecution case, petitioner and other co-accused persons are alleged to have abused and assaulted the informant with lathi and danda. Petitioner is alleged to have assaulted the informant with iron rod due to which he became injured.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. It appears from the F.I.R. itself that due to admitted land dispute, the present occurrence has taken place. There is case and counter case. Although, some persons of both sides have receives injury and the Police after investigation, submitted charge-sheet against the petitioner. One Title Suit No. 8

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top