PATNA HIGH COURT
Rajesh Kumar Verma, J
Poonam Devi – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shantanu Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER
2 19-01-2026 Heard Mr. Arvind Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Shantanu Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since
07.10.2025 in connection with Dandari P.S. Case No. 131 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 06.10.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 329(2), 124(1), 118(1), 109, 3(5) of the B.N.S.
3. According to prosecution case, petitioner and other co-accused persons are alleged to have assaulted the informant. On the instigation of petitioner, co-accused, namely, Mukesh Soni throw acid on the informant’s husband.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and she has falsely been implicated in the present case. Although, the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. but from bare perusal of F.I.R. it appears that the specific allegation of assault is against co-accused Mukesh Soni and petitioner has been made accused merely on the ground that she is
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.