SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4455

PATNA HIGH COURT
Rajesh Kumar Verma, J
Poonam Devi – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Arvind Kumar
For the Respondents: Mr. Shantanu Kumar

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shantanu Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

2 19-01-2026 Heard Mr. Arvind Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Shantanu Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since

07.10.2025 in connection with Dandari P.S. Case No. 131 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 06.10.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 329(2), 124(1), 118(1), 109, 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. According to prosecution case, petitioner and other co-accused persons are alleged to have assaulted the informant. On the instigation of petitioner, co-accused, namely, Mukesh Soni throw acid on the informant’s husband.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and she has falsely been implicated in the present case. Although, the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. but from bare perusal of F.I.R. it appears that the specific allegation of assault is against co-accused Mukesh Soni and petitioner has been made accused merely on the ground that she is

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top