PATNA HIGH COURT
RAJESH KUMAR VERMA, J
Jitendra Paswan @ Jitendra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER
2 19-01-2026 Heard Mr. Deepak Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since
15.10.2025 in connection with Sheikhpura P.S. Case No. 309 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 14.10.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 317(5), 318(4) of the B.N.S. , 2023.
3. According to prosecution case, a stolen motorcycle in question was recovered from the possession of the accused-
petitioner.
petitioner is innocent and the petitioner has not committed any appears from seizure list there is non-compliance of section 103 BNSS and only Police personnel is the seizure witness which suggest that petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that the police after investigation, submitted charge-sheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 15.10.2025.
5. Learned APP has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.