Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
Rajesh Kumar Verma, J
Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Rai – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. abduction allegations against petitioners are disbelieved based on chargesheet findings. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. state's opposition to bail includes prior cases. (Para 5) |
| 3. bail granted with specific conditions related to evidence tampering and trial cooperation. (Para 6) |
For the Petitioner/s : Mrs. Neetu Jha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Yogendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER
2 19-01-2026 Heard Mrs. Neetu Jha, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Yogendra Kumar Singh, learned APP for the State.
2. Petitioners seek bail, who are in custody since
15.11.2025, in connection with Musarigharari P.S. Case No. 193 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 27.10.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 140(3), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S.
3. Allegation against the petitioners is that they have abducted the husband of the informant and assaulted him.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the police after investigation submitted chargesheet under Sections
126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 118(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S. and the police has di
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
