SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4464

PATNA HIGH COURT
Rajesh Kumar Verma, J
Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Rai – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mrs. Neetu Jha
For the Respondents: Mr. Yogendra Kumar Singh

For the Petitioner/s : Mrs. Neetu Jha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Yogendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

2 19-01-2026 Heard Mrs. Neetu Jha, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Yogendra Kumar Singh, learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioners seek bail, who are in custody since

15.11.2025, in connection with Musarigharari P.S. Case No. 193 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 27.10.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 140(3), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. Allegation against the petitioners is that they have abducted the husband of the informant and assaulted him.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the police after investigation submitted chargesheet under Sections

126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 118(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S. and the police has disbelieved the kidnapping the husband of the informant in the Chargesheet dated 20.12.2025. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that it appears from the aforesaid chargesheet, the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. against the petitioners is false and fabricated and the pet

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top