SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4471

PATNA HIGH COURT
RAJESH KUMAR VERMA, J
Chulai Musahar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84904 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms. Malti Kumari
For the Respondents: Mr. Syed Ehteshamuddin

The court can grant bail when specific allegations are lacking and the accused has no previous criminal record, provided suitable conditions are upheld.

Headnote:The petitioner seeks bail under sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 337, 338, 302, and 307 IPC, alleging wrongful implication in a case of fatal assault. The court noted the lack of specific allegations against the petitioner and his clean record, permitting bail subject to conditions regarding trial cooperation and non-tampering with evidence. The court framed the question of whether bail could be granted under these circumstances, concluding that the petitioner could be released if he adhered to specified conditions. RESULT: The petitioner is granted bail on certain conditions.

Table of Content
1. petitioner in custody for alleged assault leading to death. (Para 2 , 3)
2. arguments presented regarding lack of specific allegations. (Para 4 , 5)
3. bail granted with conditions for trial cooperation. (Para 6)

For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Malti Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Syed Ehteshamuddin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

3 19-01-2026 Heard Ms. Malti Kumari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Syed Ehteshamuddin, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since

18.01.2025 in connection with Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 107 of 2023, F.I.R. dated 18.03.2023 for the offences punishable under Sections 147 , 148, 149, 323, 341, 337, 338, 302 and 307 of the IPC.

3. According to prosecution case, this petitioner along with other accused persons brutally assaulted the informant and his brothers-in-law due to which one Mohan Musahar died during treatment.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. Although the petitioner is named in the F.I.R but it appears from the F.I.R itself that there is no direct or specific allegation of assault against the petitioner rather there is general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons including this petitioner. She further submits that the police after investigation submitted the charge sheet against the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since

18.01.2025.

5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances that the petitioner has clean antecedent and there is no specific allegation against the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM-I, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 107 of 2023, subject to the following conditions:-

i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)

Vanisha/- U T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top