PATNA HIGH COURT
RAJESH KUMAR VERMA, J
Lalit Kumar Sah – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Prakash, Advocate For the State : Mr. Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER
3 19-01-2026 Heard Mr. Ravi Prakash, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Anil Kumar, learned APP for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since
06.11.2025, in connection with Pandaul P.S. Case No. 218 of 2025, G.R. No. 1279 of 2025 F.I.R. dated 17.09.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30 (a), 41(1), 31(1), 31(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 .
3. Recovery is of 5385.12 litres of foreign wine.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. and petitioner ha been made accused merely on the basis of disclosure made by local choukidar as well as his previous criminal antecedent of similar nature. It appears from the F.I.R. as well as seizure list that nothing has been recovered from
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.