SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4475

PATNA HIGH COURT
RAJESH KUMAR VERMA, J
Lalit Kumar Sah – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Ravi Prakash
For the Respondents: Mr. Anil Kumar

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Prakash, Advocate For the State : Mr. Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

3 19-01-2026 Heard Mr. Ravi Prakash, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Anil Kumar, learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since

06.11.2025, in connection with Pandaul P.S. Case No. 218 of 2025, G.R. No. 1279 of 2025 F.I.R. dated 17.09.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30 (a), 41(1), 31(1), 31(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 .

3. Recovery is of 5385.12 litres of foreign wine.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. and petitioner ha been made accused merely on the basis of disclosure made by local choukidar as well as his previous criminal antecedent of similar nature. It appears from the F.I.R. as well as seizure list that nothing has been recovered from

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top