SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4476

PATNA HIGH COURT
RAJESH KUMAR VERMA, J
Sujit Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Vaidehi Raman Prasad Singh
For the Respondents: Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vaidehi Raman Prasad Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

3 19-01-2026 Heard Mr. Vaidehi Raman Prasad Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since

22.10.2025, in connection with Tariyani P.S. Case No. 131 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 14.06.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the B.N.S.

3. Allegation against the petitioner is of forcibly withdrawing half of the amount from the account of beneficiaries of State Government under Bihar State “Fasal Sahayta Scheme”.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and the name of the petitioner has been transpired on the basis of confessional statement of apprehended co-accused person namely Manish Kumar and the said Manish Kumar has been granted default bail by the learned Court below

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top