SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4480

PATNA HIGH COURT
RAJESH KUMAR VERMA, J
Rajesh Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90358 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Ravi Prakash
For the Respondents: Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha, APP

Bail granted amidst allegations of serious offenses, conditioned on cooperation with the court and verification of antecedents.

Headnote:1. Under the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, and the Arms Act, the petitioner sought bail while arguing false implication in a case involving a shooting incident on 28.08.2025, despite being in custody since 11.09.2025. The FIR claims specific allegations of firing and prior criminal antecedents. 2. Court framed the issue as to the petitioner’s entitlement to bail in light of the allegations and the recovery of evidence linking him to the crime. The court determined that despite the opposition by the prosecution, the petitioner was granted bail subject to conditions ensuring cooperation and non-tampering of evidence. 3. The final order granted the petitioner bail on conditions including cooperation in trial, presence on court dates, and verification of criminal antecedents.

Table of Content
1. bail sought amidst serious allegations. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. prosecution opposes bail based on evidence. (Para 5)
3. court grants bail with specified conditions. (Para 6)

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Prakash, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

2 19-01-2026 Heard Mr. Ravi Prakash, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since

11.09.2025 in connection with Khajauli P.S. Case No. 177 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 28.08.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita , 2023 and Section 27 of Arms Act .

3. According to prosecution case, the informant alleged that on 28.08.2025 at about 09:00 AM,when he was returning home and reached near village Kasma Kwahar Bandh, the petitioner fired upon him due to which he fell down.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is false and fabricated. It appears from the FIR itself that the informant did not received any injury and FIR has been instituted only to falsely implicate the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 11.09.2025.

5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that from bare perusal of the FIR it appears that specific allegation of firing is attributed against the petitioner and a misfired cartridge has also been recovered from the place of occurrence and apart from that the petitioner carries six criminal antecedents other than the present one but fairly submits on the basis of paragraph-3 of the bail application that the petitioner is on bail in the pending matters.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Madhubani in connection with Khajauli P.S. Case No. 177 of

2025, subject to the following conditions:-

i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top