SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4480

PATNA HIGH COURT
RAJESH KUMAR VERMA, J
Rajesh Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Ravi Prakash
For the Respondents: Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha, APP

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Prakash, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

2 19-01-2026 Heard Mr. Ravi Prakash, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since

11.09.2025 in connection with Khajauli P.S. Case No. 177 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 28.08.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita , 2023 and Section 27 of Arms Act .

3. According to prosecution case, the informant alleged that on 28.08.2025 at about 09:00 AM,when he was returning home and reached near village Kasma Kwahar Bandh, the petitioner fired upon him due to which he fell down.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is false and fabricated. It appears from the FIR itself that the informant did not received any injury and FIR has been instituted only to falsely implicate

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top