SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4481

PATNA HIGH COURT
RAJESH KUMAR VERMA, J
Gajadhar Mandal – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Satya Prakash Parasar
For the Respondents: Mr. Pranav Kumar

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satya Prakash Parasar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pranav Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

2 19-01-2026 Heard Mr. Satya Prakash Parasar, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Pranav Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since

20.09.2025 in connection with Chihra P.S. Case No. 78 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 16.09.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 308(3), 308(4), 308(5), 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita , 2023 and Sections 16 , 17, 18,20, 21 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act .

3. According to prosecution case, on secret information regarding Naxal activities, police reached place of occurrence and found black flag hoisted on the bamboo stick foam plates, pamphlets written in red ink containing threats etc and upon enquiry found that some naxalies have put the above articles with intention to create obstruction in the upcoming assembly election by creating fear among the villagers. Hence the FIR.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top