SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4483

PATNA HIGH COURT
Rajesh Kumar Verma, J
Ravi Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Nilesh Kumar Pandey
For the Respondents: Mr. Harendra Prasad, APP

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nilesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Harendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

2 20-01-2026 Heard Mr. Nilesh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Harendra Prasad, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since 01.07.2025 in connection with Chandi P.S. Case No. 304 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 12.06.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 309(6) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and 27 of Arms Act .

3. According to prosecution case, the informant alleged that on 12.06.2025, two miscreants came in motorcycle and snatched his blue colour shoulder bag containing Rs.1.20 lacs in cash, laptop, biometric machine, cheque books etc. It is further alleged that one of the accused fired upon the informant and somehow he managed to escape.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is false and fabricated. Petitioner is not named in the FIR

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top