SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4492

PATNA HIGH COURT
RAJESH KUMAR VERMA, J
Nitesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Pankaj Kumar Dubey
For the Respondents: Mr. Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Dubey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

2 20-01-2026 Heard Mr. Pankaj Kumar Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since

18.08.2025 in connection with Bhore P.S. Case No. 421 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 17.08.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act .

3. According to prosecution case, one country-made co-accused, Sohil Kumar. One T.V.S Appache motorcycle without registration number and one Hero motorcycle was recovered from the house of Yadunandan Kumar.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. There is non-compliance of Section 100 of Cr.P.C/103 of B.N.S.S. It appears from the FIR that only one live cartridge was recovered from the possession of the petitioner and arms have been recovered from the possession of other co-accused persons. He further s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top