SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4494

PATNA HIGH COURT
RAJESH KUMAR VERMA, J
Guddu Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Aryan Singh
For the Respondents: Mr. Lalan Kumar

For the Petitioner : Mr. Aryan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Lalan Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

2 20-01-2026 Heard Mr. Aryan Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Lalan Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since

25.04.2025 in connection with Barachatty P.S. Case No. 150 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 25.04.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 311 and 312 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.

3. According to prosecution case, while the informant has been carrying garlic in a pickup van, the vehicle suffered a puncture. While the informant and his father-in-law had been changing tyre, some miscreants came there and tried to drag away the informant and in the scuffle the clothes of the informant was torn. The miscreants also assaulted the father-in-

law of the informant and later on, shot him.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. The allegation as alleged in the F.I.R is false and fabricated and the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top