PATNA HIGH COURT
Rajesh Kumar Verma, J
Indal Manjhi @ Indal Kumar Manjhi – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Saxena, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajendra Nath Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER
2 20-01-2026 Heard Mr. Anil Kumar Saxena, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Rajendra Nath Jha, learned APP for the State.
2. Petitioners seek bail, who are in custody since
20.07.2025, in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 685 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 14.07.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109, 329(3), 329(4), 352 of the B.N.S. and Section ¾ Prohibition of Witch Protection Act , 1999.
3. Allegation against the petitioners is that they along with other co-accused came to the house of the informant having sword and knife and brutally assaulted her husband to his head, back side, neck and other parts of the body due to which he received injuries.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have clean antecedents and they have been falsely implicated in the present case. Although, the petitioners are named in the F.I.R. but from perusal of the F.I.R. it appears that there is no specific alle
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.