PATNA HIGH COURT
RAJESH KUMAR VERMA, J
Ravish Kumar @ Ravi Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER
2 20-01-2026 Heard Mr. Deepak Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, learned APP for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since
03.08.2025, in connection with Bypass P.S. Case No. 392 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 3.07.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 309(4) of the B.N.S.
3. The F.I.R. of the occurrence of loot is against unknown.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. In fact, the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and the name of the petitioner has been transpired on the basis of secret information. Although, one mobile phone has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner but the said mobile is in the name of the petit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.