SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4510

PATNA HIGH COURT
Rajesh Kumar Verma, J
Pappu Yadav – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Davendra Kumar Pandey
For the Respondents: Mr. Satyendra Prasad

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Davendra Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the State : Mr. Satyendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

2 20-01-2026 Heard Mr. Davendra Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Satyendra Prasad, learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since

18.10.2024, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 358 of 2025 arising out of Nadi P.S. Case No. 24 of 2020, F.I.R. dated 13.05.2020 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147 , 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act .

3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he along with other co-accused persons have fired upon the informant with an intention to kill but anyhow he succeeded to flee away.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. From perusal of the F.I.R. it appears that f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top