For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Madhurendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

2 20-01-2026 Heard Mr. Madhurendra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since

12.06.2025 in connection with Jitna P.S. Case No. 128 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 12.06.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 123 and 3(5) of the BNS , 2023.

3. According to prosecution case, the informant claimed that all the accused persons including this petitioner killed his daughter.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and she has falsely been implicated in the present case. The allegation as alleged in the F.I.R is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. The petitioner has been made accused merely on the ground that she is mother-in-law of the deceased. It appears from the F.I.R that there is no specific allegation of assault or demand of dowry