SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4516

PATNA HIGH COURT
Rajesh Kumar Verma, J
Gaurav Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.Abhimanyu Deo
For the Respondents: Mr.Bhanu Pratap Singh

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Abhimanyu Deo, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Bhanu Pratap Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

2 21-01-2026 Heard Mr.Abhimanyu Deo, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Bhanu Pratap Singh, learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since

22.08.2025 in connection with Alamganj P.S. Case No. 777 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 22.07.2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 303(2) of BNS, 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that the Scooty of the informant was stolen from the Court campus situated at Patna City by unknown persons.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it appears from the FIR that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. The name of the petitioner has been transpired during investigation on the basis of the confessional statement of co- accused person, namely, Ravi Kumar and till date no TIP has been conducted by the prosecution and nothing has been recovered from conscious possession or the house of the petitioner and except the confessional statement of co-accused person, no other cog

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top