SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4518

PATNA HIGH COURT
Rajesh Kumar Verma, J
Mantu Mahto – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.Bimlesh Kumar Pandey
For the Respondents: Ms.Anita Kumari, APP

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms.Anita Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

2 21-01-2026 Heard Mr.Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms.Anita Kumari, learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners seeks bail, who is in custody since

21.11.2025 in connection with Purushottampur P.S. Case No. 110 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 03.09.2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(1), 191(2), 109(1), 115(2), 303(2), 352, 351(2)of BNS , 2023.

3. Allegation against the petitioners is that they assaulted to the informant and his father by means of iron rod.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have clean antecedent. The allegation as alleged in the FIR is false and fabricated and the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. Although there is specific allegation against the petitioners that they have assaulted to the informnat and other persons but the injury inflicted upon the injured persons is simple in nature and there is case and counter case. The

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top