PATNA HIGH COURT
Rajesh Kumar Verma, J
Mantu Mahto – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms.Anita Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER
2 21-01-2026 Heard Mr.Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms.Anita Kumari, learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners seeks bail, who is in custody since
21.11.2025 in connection with Purushottampur P.S. Case No. 110 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 03.09.2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(1), 191(2), 109(1), 115(2), 303(2), 352, 351(2)of BNS , 2023.
3. Allegation against the petitioners is that they assaulted to the informant and his father by means of iron rod.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have clean antecedent. The allegation as alleged in the FIR is false and fabricated and the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. Although there is specific allegation against the petitioners that they have assaulted to the informnat and other persons but the injury inflicted upon the injured persons is simple in nature and there is case and counter case. The
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.