SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4521

PATNA HIGH COURT
Rajesh Kumar Verma, J
Pyare Chauhan – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.Vibhuti Ranjan Sonvadra
For the Respondents: Mrs.Gulnar Begum, APP

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vibhuti Ranjan Sonvadra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs.Gulnar Begum, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

2 21-01-2026 Heard Mr.Vibhuti Ranjan Sonvadra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs.Gulnar Begum, learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since

27.09.2025 in connection with Narhat P.S. Case No. 294 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 10.09.2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 115(2), 118(1), 109, 351(2), 352 of BNS, 2023.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent. Although there received the injury but the injury report of the informant suggests that the injury inflicted upon the informant is simple in nature, there is case and counter case and the police, after investigation, submitted chargesheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 27.09.2025.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid fact, petitioner has clean antecedent, there is case and counter case an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top