PATNA HIGH COURT
Rajesh Kumar Verma, J
Pyare Chauhan – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vibhuti Ranjan Sonvadra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs.Gulnar Begum, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER
2 21-01-2026 Heard Mr.Vibhuti Ranjan Sonvadra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs.Gulnar Begum, learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since
27.09.2025 in connection with Narhat P.S. Case No. 294 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 10.09.2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 115(2), 118(1), 109, 351(2), 352 of BNS, 2023.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent. Although there received the injury but the injury report of the informant suggests that the injury inflicted upon the informant is simple in nature, there is case and counter case and the police, after investigation, submitted chargesheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 27.09.2025.
5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid fact, petitioner has clean antecedent, there is case and counter case an
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.