Bail granted based on clean antecedents and minor injury report, with conditions imposed to ensure trial cooperation.

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vibhuti Ranjan Sonvadra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs.Gulnar Begum, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

2 21-01-2026 Heard Mr.Vibhuti Ranjan Sonvadra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs.Gulnar Begum, learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since

27.09.2025 in connection with Narhat P.S. Case No. 294 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 10.09.2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 115(2), 118(1), 109, 351(2), 352 of BNS, 2023.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent. Although there received the injury but the injury report of the informant suggests that the injury inflicted upon the informant is simple in nature, there is case and counter case and the police, after investigation, submitted chargesheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 27.09.2025.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid fact, petitioner has clean antecedent, there is case and counter case and the injury inflicted upon the informant is simple in nature, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1^st Class, Nawada in connection with Narhat P.S. Case No. 294 of 2025, with the following conditions:-

(I) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(II) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(III) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)