SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4522

PATNA HIGH COURT
Rajesh Kumar Verma, J
Satya Kure @ Soni – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.Bipin Kumar
For the Respondents: Mrs.Nirmala Kumari

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bipin Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs.Nirmala Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

2 21-01-2026 Heard Mr.Bipin Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs.Nirmala Kumari, learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since

04.12.2025 in connection with Rajgir P.S. Case No. 676 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 03.12.2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 143(2), 145,74,111(4),3(5) of BNS, 2023 , Section 8 of POCSO Act , Sections 75 /79 of J.J. Act and Section 16 ,17 and 18 of the Banded Labour System Act , 1976.

3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he called the Girls for dancing in Orchestra who were arrested from the place of occurrence.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent. The allegation as alleged in the FIR is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. Petitioner has been made accused in the present case merely on the ground that the he is part and parcel of the said Orchestra Group, apart f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top