SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4524

PATNA HIGH COURT
RAJESH KUMAR VERMA, J
Abhishek Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Manoj Kumar Pandey
For the Respondents: Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, APP

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Manoj Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Rana Randhir Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

2 21-01-2026 Heard Mr.Manoj Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Rana Randhir Singh, learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since

08.09.2025, in connection with N.D.P.S. Case No. 09 of 2025 arising out of Kharagpur P.S. Case No. 202 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 08.09.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8(C), 21(b), of the N.D.P.S. and Section 7 of the Lottery Act .

3. Recovery is of 28 Gms. of Smack.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that it appears from the F.I.R. as well as seizure list that altogether 101 Puria of Smack (28 grams) was recovered from the possession of the petitioner and other co-accused person and the recovered contraband is 28 Gms. of Smack and hence there is no embargo under Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act to enlarge the petitioner on bail. He further

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top