SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4529

PATNA HIGH COURT
Rajesh Kumar Verma, J
Lato Devi – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat, APP

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

3 21-01-2026 Heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since

28.06.025 in connection with Chandi P.S. Case No. 328 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 27.06.2022 for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 3(5) of the BNS ,2023.

3. According to prosecution case, the informant alleged that the petitioner along with other co-accused persons killed his daughter.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case and she has been made accused only on the ground that she is the mother-in-law of the deceased. From bare perusal of the FIR it appears that there is no specific allegation of assault or overt act against him rather there is general and omnibus against all the accused persons including the petitioner and informant is not the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top