SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4530

PATNA HIGH COURT
RAJESH KUMAR VERMA, J
Rupesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Ajay Mukherjee
For the Respondents: Mr. Parmanand Kumar

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Mukherjee, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Parmanand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

4 21-01-2026 Despite of entered appearance through Vakalatnama, no one appeared on behalf of the Opposite Party No.2. 2. Heard Mr. Ajay Mukherjee, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Parmanand Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

3. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since

2025, F.I.R. dated 06.06.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 81 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita , 2023 and Section 4 of the POCSO Act .

4. According to prosecution case, the informant alleged that on 04.05.2025, the petitioner came to meet her daughter and made physical relation with her. It is further alleged that on pretext of marriage, the petitioner used to make physical relation with informant’s daughter for about six months.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. From bare perusal of the FIR it appears that there is specific allegation against th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top