SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4531

PATNA HIGH COURT
RAJESH KUMAR VERMA, J
Raushan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Vasant Vikas
For the Respondents: Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vasant Vikas, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

4 21-01-2026 Heard Mr. Vasant Vikas, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since

21.05.2025 in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 97 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 13.04.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 87 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita , 2023.

3. According to prosecution case, the informant alleged that on 11.04.2025, the petitioner along with other co- accused persons came to the house of her daughter-in-law, namely, Pinki Kumari and and lured her and taken her away with intention of prostitution and have absconded.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. It appears from the FIR itself that one Sumit Kumar used to come in the house of the Pinki Kumari and petitioner is not at all involved in the present occurrence and he has been mad

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top