SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4532

PATNA HIGH COURT
RAJESH KUMAR VERMA, J
Uttam Pandey – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Amrendra Kumar
For the Respondents: Ms. Renu Kumari

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amrendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Renu Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

3 21-01-2026 Heard Mr. Amrendra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. Renu Kumari, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since

28.07.2025 in connection with Khaira P.S. Case No. 248 of 2015, F.I.R. dated 19.11.2015 for the offences punishable under Sections 307 /34 of the Indian Penal Code .

3. As per the F.I.R. the informant was called by the petitioner at the main road, where Sanjit Pandey was already there, the petitioner snatched his mobile, whereafter, the informant returned back to his house. On the next day, the petitioner again came to the house of the informant and told him to come with him for taking his mobile and brought him on motorcycle and carried to Jhundo and there with intention to kill him pressed his neck, as a result, the informant became senseless and later taken to hospital for treatment.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top