SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4533

PATNA HIGH COURT
Rajesh Kumar Verma, J
Prem Yadav – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76280 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Anshul, Mr. Ravi Prakash Dwivedi, Mr. Aditya Singh, Mr. Raushan Kumar, Mr. Saurabh Raj
For the Respondents: Mr. Braj Kishore Pd., APP

The court granted bail based on findings of suicide and false implications, stipulating conditions for trial cooperation.

Headnote:The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Katoriya P.S. Case No. 46 of 2025 for offences under the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleges involvement in a murder, while the petitioner claims false implication due to familial ties to the deceased. The court acknowledges investigative findings revealing suicide by the deceased. The primary issues were whether bail should be granted and the rationale rested on established circumstances implying false allegations. The court concluded by granting bail under specific conditions emphasizing cooperation and integrity in the trial process.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's alleged involvement in a murder case linked to familial relationships. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. bail granted with specific conditions recognizing investigative findings. (Para 5 , 6)

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anshul, Sr. Advocate : Mr. Ravi Prakash Dwivedi, Advocate : Mr. Aditya Singh, Advocate : Mr. Raushan Kumar, Advocate : Mr. Saurabh Raj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Braj Kishore Pd., APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

3 21-01-2026 Heard Mr. Anshul, learned senior counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Braj Kishore Pd., learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since

20.02.2025 in connection with Katoriya P.S. Case No. 46 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 15.02.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita , 2023 and charge-sheet has been filed under Section 108 Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita , 2023.

3. According to prosecution case, the informant alleged that the petitioner along with other co-accused persons killed his daughter.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is false and fabricated and name of the petitioner transpired merely on the ground that he happens to be the husband of the deceased. Infact it has come during investigation, which is recorded in paragraph nos.23, 24 and 30 of case diary that deceased has committed suicide herself due to quarrel between the deceased and the petitioner. He further submits that the police after investigation submitted the charge-sheet and the petitioner is in custody since 20.02.2025.

5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the petitioner carries one criminal antecedent other than the present one but fairly submits on the basis of paragraph-3 of the bail application that the petitioner is on bail in the said matter.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it has come during investigation that deceased has committed suicide herself and name of the petitioner transpired merely on the ground that he happens to be the husband of the deceased, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka in connection with Katoriya P.S.

Case No. 46 of 2025, subject to the following conditions:-

i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top