SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4534

PATNA HIGH COURT
RAJESH KUMAR VERMA, J
Chunchun Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Bambam Kumar
For the Respondents: Ms. Shaheen Begum

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bambam Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Shaheen Begum, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

3 21-01-2026 Heard Mr. Bambam Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. Shaheen Begum, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since

29.04.2025 in connection with Khagaria (Gangour) P.S. Case No. 136 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 28.04.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act .

3. According to prosecution case, the informant alleged that the petitioner along with other co-accused persons killed his son by gunshot.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner is not named in the FIR and his name transpired during investigation on the basis self-confessional statement of the petitioner and except the aforesaid, no other cogent material has come during investigation which suggest the involvement of the petitioner in the pr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top