Bail granted based on clean antecedents and nature of injuries, with specific conditions to prevent evidence tampering.

For the Petitioner/s : Mrs. Khushi Awadh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

3 21-01-2026 Heard Mr. Khushi Awadh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Anil Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail, who are in custody since

18.03.2025 in connection with Dalsingsarai P.S. Case No. 97 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 16.03.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 126 , 115(2), 109, 132, 303(2), 62, 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. According to prosecution case, petitioners and other accused persons are alleged to have as attacked on the informant and tried to snatched the aforesaid application of Public Redressal Cell. Some persons have been injured.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have clean antecedent and the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. Although, some of the persons have received the injuries but the injury report of the injured persons suggest that the injuries are simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance. He further submits that the police after investigation, submitted chargesheet against the petitioners and the petitioners are in custody since 18.03.2025.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, petitioners have clean antecedent, injuries inflicted upon the injured persons are found to be simple in nature, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned District and Additional Sessions Judge, Dalsingsarai, Samastipur in connection with S. T. No. 390/2025, arising out of Dalsingsarai P.S. Case No. 97 of 2025, with the following conditions:

i. Petitioners shall co-operate in the trial and will be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

ii. If the petitioners tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioners have concealed their criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioners. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)