SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4549

PATNA HIGH COURT
Rajesh Kumar Verma, J
Badku Sah @ Ganesh Sah – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Kumar Malendu
For the Respondents: Mr.Vinod Shanker Modi

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Malendu, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Vinod Shanker Modi, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

3 21-01-2026 Heard Mr. Kumar Malendu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Vinod Shanker Modi, learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since

21.06.2025, in connection with Anandpur P.S. Case No. 62 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 20.06.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 109(1), 61(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S. ,2023.

3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he has assaulted to the informant due to which he sustained injury.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. Although the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. but from perusal of the F.I.R. it appears that F.I.R. is in two parts, in first part, there is general and omnibus allegation against all the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top