SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4551

PATNA HIGH COURT
RAJESH KUMAR VERMA, J
Shubham Sah – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77529 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Birendra Kumar
For the Respondents: Mr. Anant Kumar 1

A bail grant considering prior criminal history and conditions for trial participation.

Headnote:The court analyzed the legal provisions under Sections 317(5), 3(5) of B.N.S. 2023, noting the petitioner was in custody since 15.07.2025 and allegations of theft were substantiated by recovery of a stolen motorcycle. The bail was granted after considering previous bails and the implications of the petitioner’s criminal history. Key conditions for bail included cooperation during trial and the verification of criminal antecedents to prevent abuse of the bail privilege. The bail bond was set at Rs. 10,000.

Table of Content
1. custody and theft allegations regarding stolen motorcycle. (Para 2 , 3)
2. arguments on bail application and prior cases. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court observation on bail conditions and grant. (Para 6)

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Birendra Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Anant Kumar 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

4 21-01-2026 Heard Mr. Birendra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Anant Kumar 1, learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since

15.07.2025, in connection with Riga P.S. Case No. 270 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 14.07.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 317(5), 3(5) of B.N.S. , 2023.

3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he was caught red handed with the stolen motorcycle.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that motorcycle in question but there is non compliance of Section 103(4) of the B.N.S. , 2023 and co-accused person namely Shiv petitioner has been granted bail by the learned Court below itself vide order dated 26.11.2025 passed in B.P. No. 1285 of 2025. He further submits that the police after investigation submitted chargesheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 15.07.2025.

5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner and petitioner has accepted that the recovered motorcycle is the looted motorcycle and apart from aforesaid the petitioner carries fifteen more cases other than the present one but fairly submits on the basis of paragraph-3 of the bail petition that out of fifteen cases, petitioner is on bail in fourteen cases and one case is pending for consideration before the competent court of law.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Sitamarhi in connection with Riga P.S. Case No. 270 of 2025, subject to the following conditions :-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(3) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top