SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4553

PATNA HIGH COURT
Rajesh Kumar Verma, J
Sheikh Parvej – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77576 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mrs. Madhubala Verma
For the Respondents: Mr. Amitesh Kumar

Bail granted due to lack of evidence and prior co-accused's bail.

Headnote:Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bela P.S. Case No. 180 of 2025 for offences under Sections 21(c) of the N.D.P.S. Act. The case relates to recovery of cough syrup containing codeine, with nothing recovered from the petitioner. The co-accused was granted bail earlier. The court determined that the petitioner could be released on bail due to lack of evidence against him.

Result: Petitioner granted bail.

Table of Content
1. recovery of codeine cough syrup (Para 4)
2. opposition to bail based on prior cases (Para 5)
3. conditions for bail and release verification (Para 6)

For the Petitioner/s : Mrs. Madhubala Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Amitesh Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

3 21-01-2026 Heard Mrs. Madhubala Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Amitesh Kumar, learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since

24.08.2025, in connection with Bela P.S. Case No. 180 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 23.08.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 21(c) of the N.D.P.S. Act .

3. The case relates to recovery of 120 bottles each of

100 ml ONEROX cough syrup containing codeine.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it appears from the F.I.R. as well as seizure list that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner rather recovery has been made from the house of co-accused person namely Md. Shabir @ Raja who happens to be the brother of petitioner and petitioner has been made accused on the basis of suspicion that he was fled away from the place of occurrence and the said co-accused person, namely, Md. Shabir @ Raja has been granted bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 15.01.2026. She further submits that the police after investigation submitted chargesheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 24.08.2025.

5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the petitioner carries two more cases of similar nature but fairly submits that the petitioner has not been remanded in the second case i.e. Bela P.S. Case No. 13 of

2025 under Section 21(c) of the N.D.P.S. Act .

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and co-accused person has been granted bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge (N.D.P.S.) Act, Sitamarhi in connection with Bela P.S. Case No. 180 of 2025, subject to the following conditions :-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(3) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top