SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4554

PATNA HIGH COURT
Rajesh Kumar Verma, J
Raja Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Nitish Kumar
For the Respondents: Mr. Surendra Kumar

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nitish Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Surendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

3 21-01-2026 Heard Mr. Nitish Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Surendra Kumar, learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since

18.05.2025, in connection with Parsa Bazar P.S. Case No. 209 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 17.05.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 238 of B.N.S.

3. As per prosecution case, the petitioner and other co-

accused persons allegedly kill the informant’s son and threw the dead body under a bridge in order to conceal it.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. He further submits that during investigation one Sumit Kumar and Vikash Kumar @ Laddu Kumar have been arrested and they have confessed their guilt in the present case which was recorded in p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top