PATNA HIGH COURT
RAJESH KUMAR VERMA, J
Bhuttu Ram @ Bhulai Ram – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77856 of 2025 | PS. Case No.-23 Year-2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's initial observations regarding the hearing. (Para 2) |
| 2. allegations and defense regarding bail request. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. conditions for bail granted to the petitioner. (Para 7) |
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Rana, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, APP For the Informant : Md. Mumtaz Uddin, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER
4 22-01-2026 Heard Mr. Mukesh Kumar Rana, learned counsel for the petitioner, Md. Mumtaz Uddin, learned counsel for the Informant as well as Mr. Umeshanand Pandit,learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since
06.08.2025 in connection with Bardaha P.S. Case No. 23 of 2024, F.I.R. dated 23.03.2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 420 , 406, 120B of the Indian Penal Code .
3. According to prosecution case, the informant alleged that the petitioner along with other co-accused person took Rs.12,14,000/- from him for registry of land but did not do the same.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that the petitioner had taken money in tune of Rs. 2,64,000/- only from the informant and he is ready to pay the same and rest amount to be paid after the final outcome of the present case.
5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner on the ground that petitioner carries one criminal antecedent. 6. Learned counsel for the Informant submits that the petitioner had taken Rs. 12,14,000/- from the informant but on instruction, ready to accept Rs. 2,64,000/- from the petitioner.
7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate-I Class, Araria in connection with Bardaha P.S. Case No. 23 of 2024, subject to the following conditions:-
i. At the time of furnishing bail bond, the petitioner shall produce a demand draft of Rs. 2,64,000/- (Rupees Two Lakh Sixty Four Thousand) in favour of the informant and learned court below is directed to handover the said demand draft to the informant or his representative.
ii. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.
iii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
iv. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.